Hi All,
There are more great points at Paper 103. This point is very intriguing since it mentions something about our unique experiences:
Quote:
103:1 PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION
103:1.1 The unity of religious experience among a social or racial group derives from the identical nature of the God fragment indwelling the individual. It is this divine in man that gives origin to his unselfish interest in the welfare of other men. But since personality is unique—no two mortals being alike—it inevitably follows that no two human beings can similarly interpret the leadings and urges of the spirit of divinity which lives within their minds. A group of mortals can experience spiritual unity, but they can never attain philosophic uniformity. And this diversity of the interpretation of religious thought and experience is shown by the fact that twentieth-century theologians and philosophers have formulated upward of five hundred different definitions of religion. In reality, every human being defines religion in the terms of his own experiential interpretation of the divine impulses emanating from the God spirit that indwells him, and therefore must such an interpretation be unique and wholly different from the religious philosophy of all other human beings.
This paper makes it clear that none of us can interpret the spirit leadings from our Thought Adjusters in a similar way. Because we are individuals and because we have our own set of experiences we will interpret things in a different way. This paper also states that there have been over five hundred different definitions of religion. Just one look at Christianity's over thirty-five thousand sects will indicate how difficult it is to come together as disparate individuals and to develop a religion that will be accepted by all.
Quote:
103:1.2 When one mortal is in full agreement with the religious philosophy of a fellow mortal, that phenomenon indicates that these two beings have had a similar religious experience touching the matters concerned in their similarity of philosophic religious interpretation.
There are some here that fit this definition. These persons have had a similar religious experience so they are in full agreement as to the proper way to introduce new concepts and a new religion that may result from the FER.
This is the problem when trying to create a new religion. I do not want to dampen your enthusiasm. It's just that everyone has a unique sense about him and a unique Thought Adjuster so we will all have the tendency to see things a little different than our brothers. We may have similarities. There is no question that all of us here that have read the FER have a persective that most others on our planet cannot see. But there are other religious groups out there that have a similar paradigm even though they do not have access to the FER.
Quote:
103:1.3 While your religion is a matter of personal experience, it is most important that you should be exposed to the knowledge of a vast number of other religious experiences (the diverse interpretations of other and diverse mortals) to the end that you may prevent your religious life from becoming egocentric—circumscribed, selfish, and unsocial.
I have not exposed myself to other religions and religious experiences as much as I would like. But I have been exposing myself to other religious leanings of late to get a perspective that my other brethren have. Yogananda was a a very unique individual that made the pursuit of the spiritual and the spreading of love the most important thing in his life. He may not have known about the FER, but he was listening to the leanings of his Thought Adjuster. He interpreted these leanings in a uniques way that we may not have similarly interpreted. Still, he was guided by his Father fragment.
Quote:
103:1.4 Rationalism is wrong when it assumes that religion is at first a primitive belief in something which is then followed by the pursuit of values. Religion is primarily a pursuit of values, and then there formulates a system of interpretative beliefs. It is much easier for men to agree on religious values—goals—than on beliefs—interpretations. And this explains how religion can agree on values and goals while exhibiting the confusing phenomenon of maintaining a belief in hundreds of conflicting beliefs—creeds. This also explains why a given person can maintain his religious experience in the face of giving up or changing many of his religious beliefs. Religion persists in spite of revolutionary changes in religious beliefs. Theology does not produce religion; it is religion that produces theologic philosophy.
This can explain how there are so many sects of Christianity. They agree on basic values and goals but differ in their interpretation of beliefs.
Quote:
103:1.5 That religionists have believed so much that was false does not invalidate religion because religion is founded on the recognition of values and is validated by the faith of personal religious experience. Religion, then, is based on experience and religious thought; theology, the philosophy of religion, is an honest attempt to interpret that experience. Such interpretative beliefs may be right or wrong, or a mixture of truth and error.
So, we all look for religious values and then attempt to apply those values in our daily lives. And faith is a personal experience that each individual has a different amount of.
Quote:
103:1.6 The realization of the recognition of spiritual values is an experience which is superideational. There is no word in any human language which can be employed to designate this " sense, " " feeling, " " intuition, " or " experience " which we have elected to call God-consciousness. The spirit of God that dwells in man is not personal—the Adjuster is prepersonal—but this Monitor presents a value, exudes a flavor of divinity, which is personal in the highest and infinite sense. If God were not at least personal, he could not be conscious, and if not conscious, then would he be infrahuman.
We have heard a term that we call Christ-consciousness. That means we recognize the value of living a life in such a way that Christ would have lived it. However, there are many persons out there that do not have a Christ-consciousness. (At least, they would not admit to it) But they do have a God-consciousness. There is a feeling that these individuals have in their hearts that spurs them on to do things the way that their Father would do things.
So, when I think of the term religion, I see more than a set of values, an institution, a set of creeds or beliefs. Religion simply means a way of life. We have made a process out of that word to mean something that has rites, rituals, dogma, creeds, etc. Religions of our day have attracted persons that are willing to sacrifice their individuality for the whole. Their is a certain conformity and religious rite to some of the religions in our world today.
But I see religion as a living dynamic. Because we are really a religion unto ourselves. If we truly have God-consciousness then we see that it is not some ritual, dogma or conformist beliefs that constitute religion. How we live our lives day to day is like a living prayer to our Father. We could very well belong to a formalized religion, but lose sight of our God-consciousness. In effect, Jesus became the Father for us here on our planet to show us what the Father would be like if he were a human upon our planet.
So, we certainly have a glut of religions on our planet. But we do not have a glut of God-consciousness individuals. These individuals are found in every country, every ethnicity and every religion on our globe. Their God-consciousness transcends their religion and their religious beliefs. Not all of these persons have access to the FER, but they are still God-conscious. They want God's will to be the paramount thing in their lives.
What we need is a global recognition of our unity as humans. I don't have a problem with formalized religions if that is what some people want. But one day we will all see that a religion is simply a way of life that an individual clings to because of his love for the Father. The barriers between religions will come down when we see that all persons are equally loved by the Father and that true religion is being God-conscious in our daily lives.
Paul